↓ Skip to main content

Inference of haplotypic phase and missing genotypes in polyploid organisms and variable copy number genomic regions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inference of haplotypic phase and missing genotypes in polyploid organisms and variable copy number genomic regions
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-9-513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu-Yi Su, Jonathan White, David J Balding, Lachlan JM Coin

Abstract

The power of haplotype-based methods for association studies, identification of regions under selection, and ancestral inference, is well-established for diploid organisms. For polyploids, however, the difficulty of determining phase has limited such approaches. Polyploidy is common in plants and is also observed in animals. Partial polyploidy is sometimes observed in humans (e.g. trisomy 21; Down's syndrome), and it arises more frequently in some human tissues. Local changes in ploidy, known as copy number variations (CNV), arise throughout the genome. Here we present a method, implemented in the software polyHap, for the inference of haplotype phase and missing observations from polyploid genotypes. PolyHap allows each individual to have a different ploidy, but ploidy cannot vary over the genomic region analysed. It employs a hidden Markov model (HMM) and a sampling algorithm to infer haplotypes jointly in multiple individuals and to obtain a measure of uncertainty in its inferences. In the simulation study, we combine real haplotype data to create artificial diploid, triploid, and tetraploid genotypes, and use these to demonstrate that polyHap performs well, in terms of both switch error rate in recovering phase and imputation error rate for missing genotypes. To our knowledge, there is no comparable software for phasing a large, densely genotyped region of chromosome from triploids and tetraploids, while for diploids we found polyHap to be more accurate than fastPhase. We also compare the results of polyHap to SATlotyper on an experimentally haplotyped tetraploid dataset of 12 SNPs, and show that polyHap is more accurate. With the availability of large SNP data in polyploids and CNV regions, we believe that polyHap, our proposed method for inferring haplotypic phase from genotype data, will be useful in enabling researchers analysing such data to exploit the power of haplotype-based analyses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 72 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 7 8%