↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of the factors – enablers and barriers – affecting e-learning in health sciences education

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
392 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1066 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of the factors – enablers and barriers – affecting e-learning in health sciences education
Published in
BMC Medical Education, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krishna Regmi, Linda Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,066 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1066 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 9%
Lecturer 89 8%
Student > Bachelor 82 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 5%
Researcher 52 5%
Other 222 21%
Unknown 467 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 144 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 99 9%
Social Sciences 77 7%
Computer Science 44 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 37 3%
Other 172 16%
Unknown 493 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,567,018
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#391
of 4,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,778
of 397,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#10
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.