↓ Skip to main content

Public involvement in health research: what does ‘good’ look like in practice?

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 511)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
120 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Public involvement in health research: what does ‘good’ look like in practice?
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40900-020-0183-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Liabo, Kate Boddy, Silvia Bortoli, Jenny Irvine, Heather Boult, Mary Fredlund, Neil Joseph, Gretchen Bjornstad, Christopher Morris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 29 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Psychology 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 33 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#561,754
of 25,386,051 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#19
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,824
of 376,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.