↓ Skip to main content

Ethics, patient rights and staff attitudes in Shanghai's psychiatric hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethics, patient rights and staff attitudes in Shanghai's psychiatric hospitals
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-13-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liang Su, Jingjing Huang, Weimin Yang, Huafang Li, Yifeng Shen, Yifeng Xu

Abstract

Adherence to ethical principles in clinical research and practice is becoming topical issue in China, where the prevalence of mental illness is rising, but treatment facilities remain underdeveloped. This paper reports on a study aiming to understand the ethical knowledge and attitudes of Chinese mental health professionals in relation to the process of diagnosis and treatment, informed consent, and privacy protection in clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 33%
Psychology 13 12%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2012.
All research outputs
#20,159,700
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#942
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,650
of 164,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.