You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A convenient, rapid and efficient method for establishing transgenic lines of Brassica napus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00585-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kai Zhang, Jianjie He, Lu Liu, Runda Xie, Lu Qiu, Xicheng Li, Wenjue Yuan, Kang Chen, Yongtai Yin, May Me Me Kyaw, Aye Aye San, Shisheng Li, Xianying Tang, Chunhua Fu, Maoteng Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 4 | 25% |
China | 2 | 13% |
France | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Peru | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
Researcher | 11 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,803,229
of 23,870,022 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#206
of 1,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,533
of 372,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#7
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,870,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.