You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomized trial evaluating self-sampling for HPV DNA based tests for cervical cancer screening in Nigeria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infectious Agents and Cancer, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13027-017-0123-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fatima Modibbo, K. C. Iregbu, James Okuma, Annemiek Leeman, Annemieke Kasius, Maurits de Koning, Wim Quint, Clement Adebamowo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 19% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 83 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 91 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,795,929
of 23,671,454 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#126
of 542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,593
of 423,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,671,454 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.