Title |
Influence of macrolide maintenance therapy and bacterial colonisation on exacerbation frequency and progression of COPD (COLUMBUS): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-82 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sevim Uzun, Remco S Djamin, JanAJW Kluytmans, Nils E Van’t Veer, Anton A M Ermens, Aline J Pelle, Paul Mulder, Menno M van der Eerden, JoachimGJV Aerts |
Abstract |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by progressive development of airflow limitation that is poorly reversible. Because of a poor understanding of COPD pathogenesis, treatment is mostly symptomatic and new therapeutic strategies are limited. There is a direct relationship between the severity of the disease and the intensity of the inflammatory response. Besides smoking, one of the hypotheses for the persistent airway inflammation is the presence of recurrent infections. Macrolide antibiotics have bacteriostatic as well as anti-inflammatory properties in patients with cystic fibrosis and other inflammatory pulmonary diseases. There is consistent evidence that macrolide therapy reduces infectious exacerbations, decreases the requirement for additional antibiotics and improves nutritional measures. Because of these positive effects we hypothesised that maintenance macrolide therapy may also have beneficial effects in patients with COPD who have recurrent exacerbations. The effects on development of bacterial resistance to macrolides due to this long-term treatment are unknown. Until now, studies investigating macrolide therapy in COPD are limited. The objective of this study is to assess whether maintenance treatment with macrolide antibiotics in COPD patients with three or more exacerbations in the previous year decreases the exacerbation rate in the year of treatment and to establish microbial resistance due to the long-term treatment. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 19% |
Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 36% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 34% |