You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Co-production of “nature walks for wellbeing” public health intervention for people with severe mental illness: use of theory and practical know-how
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-08518-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gill Hubbard, Catharine Ward Thompson, Robert Locke, Dan Jenkins, Sarah-Anne Munoz, Hugo Van Woerden, Margaret Maxwell, Yaling Yang, Trish Gorely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Psychology | 11 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 76 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,108,839
of 25,035,235 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,628
of 16,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,214
of 375,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#109
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,035,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.