↓ Skip to main content

Regional differences in self-reported screening, prevalence and management of cardiovascular risk factors in Switzerland

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional differences in self-reported screening, prevalence and management of cardiovascular risk factors in Switzerland
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Marques-Vidal, Fred Paccaud

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,892,077
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,306
of 15,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,926
of 162,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#93
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.