You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Catastrophic health expenditures and its inequality in elderly households with chronic disease patients in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12939-015-0134-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhonghua Wang, Xiangjun Li, Mingsheng Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 21% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 29 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,795,929
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,194
of 1,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,357
of 355,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.