You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PALLiON – PALLiative care Integrated in ONcology: study protocol for a Norwegian national cluster-randomized control trial with a complex intervention of early integration of palliative care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-020-4224-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Nina Aass, Sigve Andersen, Cinzia Brunelli, Olav Dajani, Herish Garresori, Hanne Hamre, Ellinor C. Haukland, Mats Holmberg, Frode Jordal, Hilde Krogstad, Tonje Lundeby, Erik Torbjørn Løhre, Svein Mjåland, Arve Nordbø, Ørnulf Paulsen, Erik Schistad Staff, Torunn Wester, Stein Kaasa, Jon Håvard Loge |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,160,667
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,592
of 6,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,630
of 371,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#45
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.