You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EQ-5D™-derived utility values for different levels of migraine severity from a UK sample of migraineurs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-10-65 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan R Stafford, Asha Hareendran, Daisy S Ng-Mak, Ralph P Insinga, Ruifeng Xu, Donald E Stull |
| Abstract |
To estimate utility values for different levels of migraine pain severity from a United Kingdom (UK) sample of migraineurs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 36% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,363,429
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,022
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,931
of 167,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them