You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of questioning technique during classes in medical education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-12-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Young Hye Cho, Sang Yeoup Lee, Dong Wook Jeong, Sun Ju Im, Eun Jung Choi, Sun Hee Lee, Sun Yong Baek, Yun Jin Kim, Jeong Gyu Lee, Yu Hyone Yi, Mi Jin Bae, So Jung Yune |
| Abstract |
Questioning is one of the essential techniques used by lecturers to make lectures more interactive and effective. This study surveyed the perception of questioning techniques by medical school faculty members and analyzed how the questioning technique is used in actual classes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 4 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 93% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 25% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,818,196
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#210
of 4,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,458
of 181,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.