↓ Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of treating symptomatic, partial-thickness rotator cuff tears with fresh, uncultured, unmodified, autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (UA-ADRCs) isolated at the point of…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 1,419)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and efficacy of treating symptomatic, partial-thickness rotator cuff tears with fresh, uncultured, unmodified, autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (UA-ADRCs) isolated at the point of care: a prospective, randomized, controlled first-in-human pilot study
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13018-020-01631-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason L. Hurd, Tiffany R. Facile, Jennifer Weiss, Matthew Hayes, Meredith Hayes, John P. Furia, Nicola Maffulli, Glenn E. Winnier, Christopher Alt, Christoph Schmitz, Eckhard U. Alt, Mark Lundeen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 10 7%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 65 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 72 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#763,051
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#13
of 1,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,324
of 369,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.