↓ Skip to main content

Biomass for energy in the European Union - a review of bioenergy resource assessments

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
213 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
405 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomass for energy in the European Union - a review of bioenergy resource assessments
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-5-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niclas Scott Bentsen, Claus Felby

Abstract

This paper reviews recent literature on bioenergy potentials in conjunction with available biomass conversion technologies. The geographical scope is the European Union, which has set a course for long term development of its energy supply from the current dependence on fossil resources to a dominance of renewable resources. A cornerstone in European energy policies and strategies is biomass and bioenergy. The annual demand for biomass for energy is estimated to increase from the current level of 5.7 EJ to 10.0 EJ in 2020. Assessments of bioenergy potentials vary substantially due to methodological inconsistency and assumptions applied by individual authors. Forest biomass, agricultural residues and energy crops constitute the three major sources of biomass for energy, with the latter probably developing into the most important source over the 21st century. Land use and the changes thereof is a key issue in sustainable bioenergy production as land availability is an ultimately limiting factor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 386 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 17%
Student > Master 66 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 9%
Other 16 4%
Other 64 16%
Unknown 79 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 17%
Environmental Science 62 15%
Engineering 54 13%
Energy 20 5%
Chemistry 17 4%
Other 68 17%
Unknown 115 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,417,999
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#95
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,533
of 175,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.