You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microbiome, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40168-020-00815-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shan Sun, Roshonda B. Jones, Anthony A. Fodor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Mexico | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 261 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 25% |
Researcher | 42 | 16% |
Student > Master | 32 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 3% |
Other | 26 | 10% |
Unknown | 64 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 22 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 6% |
Engineering | 8 | 3% |
Other | 31 | 12% |
Unknown | 81 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,040,349
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,143
of 1,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,594
of 375,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#36
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.