You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness and resource allocation (CERA) 18 years of evolution: maturity of adulthood and promise beyond tomorrow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-020-00210-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mihajlo Jakovljevic, Klazien Matter-Walstra, Takuma Sugahara, Tarang Sharma, Vladimir Reshetnikov, Joav Merrick, Tetsuji Yamada, Sitaporn Youngkong, Joan Rovira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 25% |
| Oman | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 51 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,682,146
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#83
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,662
of 371,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.