↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the quality of informed consent in a vaccine field trial in a developing country setting

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the quality of informed consent in a vaccine field trial in a developing country setting
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-9-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deon Minnies, Tony Hawkridge, Willem Hanekom, Rodney Ehrlich, Leslie London, Greg Hussey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Psychology 9 10%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,609,687
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#627
of 1,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,053
of 89,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them