You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessment of desiccants and their instructions for use in rapid diagnostic tests
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-11-326 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Barbara Barbé, Philippe Gillet, Greet Beelaert, Katrien Fransen, Jan Jacobs |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 15% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 23% |
Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 23% |
Chemistry | 5 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
Engineering | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 21% |
Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,555,925
of 23,700,294 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,346
of 5,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,419
of 169,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#32
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,700,294 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.