You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient engagement with antibiotic messaging in secondary care: a qualitative feasibility study of the ‘review and revise’ experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00590-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Mowbray, Katy Sivyer, Marta Santillo, Nicola Jones, Tim E. A. Peto, A. Sarah Walker, Martin J. Llewelyn, Lucy Yardley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 22% |
| South Africa | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,398,743
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#408
of 1,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,526
of 372,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#16
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.