↓ Skip to main content

Challenging beliefs and ethical concepts: the collateral damage of SARS

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenging beliefs and ethical concepts: the collateral damage of SARS
Published in
Critical Care, May 2003
DOI 10.1186/cc2336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Bernstein, Laura Hawryluck

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,835,080
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,853
of 6,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,891
of 54,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.