↓ Skip to main content

Microscopy and molecular biology for the diagnosis and evaluation of malaria in a hospital in a rural area of Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microscopy and molecular biology for the diagnosis and evaluation of malaria in a hospital in a rural area of Ethiopia
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria A Santana-Morales, Raquel N Afonso-Lehmann, Maria A Quispe, Francisco Reyes, Pedro Berzosa, Agustin Benito, Basilio Valladares, Enrique Martinez-Carretero

Abstract

Malaria is a leading public health problem in Ethiopia. Accurate diagnosis of Plasmodium infections is crucial for the reduction of malaria in tropical areas and for epidemiological studies. The role of light microscopy (LM) as gold standard has been questioned and, therefore, new molecular methods have been developed for the detection of Plasmodium species. The aim of the present work was to compare different malaria diagnostic methods in order to detect the most common species of Plasmodium and to broaden the knowledge of malaria prevalence in a hospital in a rural area in Ethiopia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 103 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Engineering 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 32 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2012.
All research outputs
#13,363,429
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,499
of 5,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,965
of 167,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#44
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.