↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the effectiveness of high-risk human papilloma self-sampling test for cervical cancer screening in Bolivia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the effectiveness of high-risk human papilloma self-sampling test for cervical cancer screening in Bolivia
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12879-020-04963-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Allende, Pedro Surriabre, Neli Ovando, Pamela Calle, Andrea Torrico, Jaime Villarroel, Michel Bossens, Véronique Fontaine, Patricia Rodriguez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 20%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 32 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 32 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,604,607
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,556
of 7,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,051
of 371,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#68
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.