You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coffee consumption and prostate cancer risk: further evidence for inverse relationship
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kashif Shafique, Philip McLoone, Khaver Qureshi, Hing Leung, Carole Hart, David S Morrison |
| Abstract |
Higher consumption of coffee intake has recently been linked with reduced risk of aggressive prostate cancer (PC) incidence, although meta-analysis of other studies that examine the association between coffee consumption and overall PC risk remains inconclusive. Only one recent study investigated the association between coffee intake and grade-specific incidence of PC, further evidence is required to understand the aetiology of aggressive PCs. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study to examine the relationship between coffee intake and overall as well as grade-specific PC risk. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Japan | 2 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Thailand | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2013.
All research outputs
#1,812,818
of 23,552,911 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#455
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,392
of 168,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,552,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.