You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coping strategies for financial burdens in families with childhood pneumonia in Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-622 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadia I Alamgir, Aliya Naheed, Stephen P Luby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 24% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,893,368
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,310
of 15,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,600
of 101,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#39
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.