↓ Skip to main content

Development of standardized laboratory methods and quality processes for a phase III study of the RTS, S/AS01 candidate malaria vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of standardized laboratory methods and quality processes for a phase III study of the RTS, S/AS01 candidate malaria vaccine
Published in
Malaria Journal, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-10-223
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Swysen, Johan Vekemans, Myriam Bruls, Sunny Oyakhirome, Chris Drakeley, Peter Kremsner, Brian Greenwood, Opokua Ofori-Anyinam, Brenda Okech, Tonya Villafana, Terrell Carter, Barbara Savarese, Adriano Duse, Andrea Reijman, Charlotte Ingram, John Frean, Bernhards Ogutu, the Clinical Trials Partnership Committee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
Pakistan 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 80 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Librarian 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,609,687
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,488
of 5,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,624
of 120,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#19
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.