You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the public’s role in reducing low-value care: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-00986-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma E. Sypes, Chloe de Grood, Fiona M. Clement, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Liam Whalen-Browne, Henry T. Stelfox, Daniel J. Niven |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 32% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 45% |
| Scientists | 14 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 16% |
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,064,450
of 25,359,594 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#409
of 1,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,447
of 378,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,359,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.