↓ Skip to main content

The fair decision-making of children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder from the perspective of dual-process theories

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
92 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The fair decision-making of children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder from the perspective of dual-process theories
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12888-020-02562-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peiying Jin, Yao Wang, Yun Li, Yunhua Xiao, Chunyan Li, Nana Qiu, Jiao Weng, Hui Fang, Xiaoyan Ke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 38 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 36%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 40 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#579,215
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#147
of 5,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,883
of 401,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#6
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.