Title |
Japan ECMOnet for COVID-19: telephone consultations for cases with severe respiratory failure caused by COVID-19
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-020-00440-9 |
Pubmed ID |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 17% |
Timor-Leste | 1 | 8% |
Japan | 1 | 8% |
Turkey | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Singapore | 1 | 8% |
Belgium | 1 | 8% |
Vietnam | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 180 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 16% |
Other | 18 | 10% |
Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 42 | 23% |
Unknown | 53 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 33 | 18% |
Unknown | 61 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,113,484
of 25,072,471 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#239
of 565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,085
of 377,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,072,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.