You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional roles and networks of non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12929-020-00636-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi-Ying Wu, Hung-Chih Kuo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 59 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,816,959
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#94
of 1,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,850
of 373,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.