You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Natural versus commercial carbohydrate supplementation and endurance running performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-9-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brandon W Too, Sarah Cicai, Kali R Hockett, Elizabeth Applegate, Brian A Davis, Gretchen A Casazza |
| Abstract |
We examined the metabolic, performance and gastrointestinal (GI) effects of supplementation with a natural food product (raisins) compared to a commercial product (sport chews). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 19% |
| Netherlands | 15 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 14% |
| Scientists | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 35 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#410,732
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#132
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,226
of 448,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#128
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.