You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-08594-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jian Ou-Yang, Chun-Hua Bei, Hua-Qin Liang, Bo He, Jin-Yan Chen, Yong-Shui Fu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,166,122
of 24,744,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,658
of 16,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,420
of 376,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#112
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,744,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.