↓ Skip to main content

Is the Kaiser Permanente model superior in terms of clinical integration?: a comparative study of Kaiser Permanente, Northern California and the Danish healthcare system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the Kaiser Permanente model superior in terms of clinical integration?: a comparative study of Kaiser Permanente, Northern California and the Danish healthcare system
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-10-91
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Strandberg-Larsen, Michaela L Schiøtz, Jeremy D Silver, Anne Frølich, John S Andersen, Ilana Graetz, Mary Reed, Jim Bellows, Allan Krasnik, Thomas Rundall, John Hsu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Canada 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 113 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Psychology 12 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,653,530
of 25,369,304 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#7,385
of 8,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,190
of 102,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#35
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,369,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.