You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of the use of adipose-derived and bone marrow-derived stem cells for peripheral nerve regeneration in vitro and in vivo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13287-020-01661-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li Na Zhou, Jia Chuan Wang, Prince Last Mudenda Zilundu, Ya Qiong Wang, Wen Ping Guo, Sai Xia Zhang, Hui Luo, Jian Hong Zhou, Ru Dong Deng, Dong Feng Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#13,155,921
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#888
of 2,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,510
of 373,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#24
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.