↓ Skip to main content

Microtubule S-glutathionylation as a potential approach for antimitotic agents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microtubule S-glutathionylation as a potential approach for antimitotic agents
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-245
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Chen, Teresa Seefeldt, Alan Young, Xiaoying Zhang, Yong Zhao, John Ruffolo, Radhey S Kaushik, Xiangming Guan

Abstract

Microtubules have been one of the most effective targets for the development of anticancer agents. Cancer cells treated by these agents are characterized by cell arrest at G2/M phase. Microtubule-targeting drugs are, therefore, referred to as antimitotic agents. However, the clinical application of the current antimitotic drugs is hampered by emerging drug resistance which is the major cause of cancer treatment failure. The clinical success of antimitotic drugs and emerging drug resistance has prompted a search for new antimitotic agents, especially those with novel mechanisms of action. The aim of this study was to determine whether microtubules can be S-glutathionylated in cancer cells and whether the glutathionylation will lead to microtubule dysfunction and cell growth inhibition. The study will determine whether microtubule S-glutathionylation can be a novel approach for antimitotic agents.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%