↓ Skip to main content

Neurocognitive function impairment after whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases: actual assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurocognitive function impairment after whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases: actual assessment
Published in
Radiation Oncology, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-7-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnes V Tallet, David Azria, Fabrice Barlesi, Jean-Philippe Spano, Antoine F Carpentier, Antony Gonçalves, Philippe Metellus

Abstract

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is an effective treatment in brain metastases and, when combined with local treatments such as surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery, gives the best brain control. Nonetheless, WBRT is often omitted after local treatment due to its potential late neurocognitive effects. Publications on radiation-induced neurotoxicity have used different assessment methods, time to assessment, and definition of impairment, thus making it difficult to accurately assess the rate and magnitude of the neurocognitive decline that can be expected. In this context, and to help therapeutic decision making, we have conducted this literature review, with the aim of providing an average incidence, magnitude and time to occurrence of radio-induced neurocognitive decline. We reviewed all English language published articles on neurocognitive effects of WBRT for newly diagnosed brain metastases or with a preventive goal in adult patients, with any methodology (MMSE, battery of neurcognitive tests) with which baseline status was provided. We concluded that neurocognitive decline is predominant at 4 months, strongly dependant on brain metastases control, partially solved at later time, graded 1 on a SOMA-LENT scale (only 8% of grade 2 and more), insufficiently assessed in long-term survivors, thus justifying all efforts to reduce it through irradiation modulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 142 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Researcher 25 17%
Other 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 39%
Neuroscience 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 7 5%
Physics and Astronomy 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 37 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,146,599
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#803
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,615
of 165,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.