You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the SCRAM bag—a randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Perioperative Medicine, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13741-020-00140-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Barry M. Schyma, Andrew E. Wood, Saranga Sothisrihari, Paul Swinton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 35% |
United States | 7 | 30% |
Canada | 2 | 9% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Cyprus | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 30% |
Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,178,095
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Perioperative Medicine
#22
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,443
of 403,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perioperative Medicine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.