You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standard operating procedure for computing pangenome trees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Microbiome, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.4056/sigs.38923 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lars Snipen, David W. Ussery |
| Abstract |
We present the pan-genome tree as a tool for visualizing similarities and differences between closely related microbial genomes within a species or genus. Distance between genomes is computed as a weighted relative Manhattan distance based on gene family presence/absence. The weights can be chosen with emphasis on groups of gene families conserved to various degrees inside the pan-genome. The software is available for free as an R-package. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 6 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 32% |
| Researcher | 35 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 97 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#225
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,332
of 102,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.