You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Spatial and temporal patterns of diarrhoea in Bhutan 2003–2013
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-017-2611-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kinley Wangdi, Archie CA Clements |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 25% |
Researcher | 17 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 13 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 22% |
Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,138
of 8,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,483
of 328,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#65
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.