You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the quality of clinical data collection for a pan-Canadian cohort of children affected by inherited metabolic diseases: lessons learned from the Canadian Inherited Metabolic Diseases Research Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-020-01358-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kylie Tingley, Monica Lamoureux, Michael Pugliese, Michael T. Geraghty, Jonathan B. Kronick, Beth K. Potter, Doug Coyle, Kumanan Wilson, Michael Kowalski, Valerie Austin, Catherine Brunel-Guitton, Daniela Buhas, Alicia K. J. Chan, Sarah Dyack, Annette Feigenbaum, Alette Giezen, Sharan Goobie, Cheryl R. Greenberg, Shailly Jain Ghai, Michal Inbar-Feigenberg, Natalya Karp, Mariya Kozenko, Erica Langley, Matthew Lines, Julian Little, Jennifer MacKenzie, Bruno Maranda, Saadet Mercimek-Andrews, Connie Mohan, Aizeddin Mhanni, Grant Mitchell, John J. Mitchell, Laura Nagy, Melanie Napier, Amy Pender, Murray Potter, Chitra Prasad, Suzanne Ratko, Ramona Salvarinova, Andreas Schulze, Komudi Siriwardena, Neal Sondheimer, Rebecca Sparkes, Sylvia Stockler-Ipsiroglu, Yannis Trakadis, Lesley Turner, Clara Van Karnebeek, Hilary Vallance, Anthony Vandersteen, Jagdeep Walia, Ashley Wilson, Brenda J. Wilson, Andrea C. Yu, Nataliya Yuskiv, Pranesh Chakraborty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,227,814
of 24,291,750 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,445
of 2,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,272
of 376,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#19
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,291,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.