↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
102 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health
Published in
Implementation Science, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-00983-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cara C. Lewis, Meredith R. Boyd, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Aaron R. Lyon, Rinad Beidas, Brian Mittman, Gregory A. Aarons, Bryan J. Weiner, David A. Chambers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 246 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 18%
Researcher 37 15%
Student > Master 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 10 4%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 76 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 14%
Social Sciences 26 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Computer Science 8 3%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 89 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#709,491
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#66
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,249
of 388,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.