↓ Skip to main content

Consensus treatment plans for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis syndrome (PFAPA): a framework to evaluate treatment responses from the childhood arthritis and rheumatology…

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Rheumatology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 823)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus treatment plans for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis syndrome (PFAPA): a framework to evaluate treatment responses from the childhood arthritis and rheumatology research alliance (CARRA) PFAPA work group
Published in
Pediatric Rheumatology, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12969-020-00424-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gil Amarilyo, Deborah Rothman, Kalpana Manthiram, Kathryn M. Edwards, Suzanne C. Li, Gary S. Marshall, Cagri Yildirim-Toruner, Kathleen Haines, Polly J. Ferguson, Geraldina Lionetti, Julie Cherian, Yongdong Zhao, Patricia DeLaMora, Grant Syverson, Simona Nativ, Marinka Twilt, Ian C. Michelow, Yuriy Stepanovskiy, Akaluck Thatayatikom, Liora Harel, Shoghik Akoghlanian, Lori Tucker, Mariana Correia Marques, Hemalatha Srinivasalu, Evan J. Propst, Greg R. Licameli, Fatma Dedeoglu, Sivia Lapidus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 18%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 30 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 38 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,253,974
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Rheumatology
#17
of 823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,138
of 404,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Rheumatology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.