You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Healthy eating and active living for diabetes in primary care networks (HEALD-PCN): rationale, design, and evaluation of a pragmatic controlled trial for adults with type 2 diabetes
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-455 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Steven T Johnson, Clark Mundt, Allison Soprovich, Lisa Wozniak, Ronald C Plotnikoff, Jeffrey A Johnson |
Abstract |
While strong and consistent evidence supports the role of lifestyle modification in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), the best strategies for program implementation to support lifestyle modification within primary care remain to be determined. The objective of the study is to evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based self- management program for patients with T2DM within a newly established primary care network (PCN) environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 169 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 21 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
Researcher | 15 | 9% |
Other | 38 | 22% |
Unknown | 43 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 17% |
Unspecified | 21 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 10 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 14% |
Unknown | 47 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,146,599
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,254
of 14,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,401
of 164,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#183
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.