You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A novel Gateway®-compatible binary vector allows direct selection of recombinant clones in Agrobacterium tumefaciens
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-7-42 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sy Mamadou Traore, Bingyu Zhao |
Abstract |
Cloning genes into plasmid vectors is one of the key steps for studying gene function. Recently, Invitrogen™ developed a convenient Gateway® cloning system based on the site-specific DNA recombination properties of bacteriophage lambda and the cytotoxic protein ccdB, which is lethal to most E. coli strains. The ccdB protein, however, is not toxic to Agrobacterium tumefaciens, an important player often used for studying gene function in planta. This limits the direct application of the Gateway® cloning system in plant transformation-mediated research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Philippines | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 34 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 16% |
Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 59% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 21% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2012.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#1,230
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,513
of 247,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.