You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Data sources and methods used to determine pretest probabilities in a cohort of Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-00952-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michiel S. Oerbekke, Kevin Jenniskens, Rob J. P. M. Scholten, Lotty Hooft |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 33% |
| Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,919,239
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#613
of 2,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,839
of 345,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#21
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.