You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Absence of lung sliding is not a reliable indicator of pneumothorax in patients who require high PEEP
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc14219 |
Authors |
J Golub, A Markota, A Stožer, G Prosen, A Bergauer, F Svenšek, A Sinkovič |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,963,860
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,413
of 6,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,914
of 354,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#67
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.