↓ Skip to main content

Absence of lung sliding is not a reliable indicator of pneumothorax in patients who require high PEEP

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Absence of lung sliding is not a reliable indicator of pneumothorax in patients who require high PEEP
Published in
Critical Care, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/cc14219
Authors

J Golub, A Markota, A Stožer, G Prosen, A Bergauer, F Svenšek, A Sinkovič

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,463,264
of 17,468,018 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,755
of 5,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,025
of 283,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,468,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them