You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Healthcare professionals' intentions to use wiki-based reminders to promote best practices in trauma care: a survey protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick M Archambault, France Légaré, André Lavoie, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Jean Lapointe, Sylvie St-Jacques, Julien Poitras, Karine Aubin, Sylvain Croteau, Martin Pham-Dinh |
| Abstract |
Healthcare professionals are increasingly using wikis as collaborative tools to create, synthesize, share, and disseminate knowledge in healthcare. Because wikis depend on collaborators to keep content up-to-date, healthcare professionals who use wikis must adopt behaviors that foster this collaboration. This protocol describes the methods we will use to develop and test the metrological qualities of a questionnaire that will assess healthcare professionals' intentions and the determinants of those intentions to use wiki-based reminders that promote best practices in trauma care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Psychology | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,104,858
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,187
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,013
of 95,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.