↓ Skip to main content

The application of strong matrix management and PDCA cycle in the management of severe COVID-19 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
The application of strong matrix management and PDCA cycle in the management of severe COVID-19 patients
Published in
Critical Care, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-02871-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuanchao Li, Hongliang Wang, Jundong Jiao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 11 6%
Other 46 27%
Unknown 48 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 5%
Engineering 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 57 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,755,393
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,132
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,333
of 403,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#135
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.