You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of economic evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01352-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mehdi Javanbakht, Eoin Moloney, Miriam Brazzelli, Sheila Wallace, Muhammad Imran Omar, Ash Monga, Lucky Saraswat, Phil Mackie, Mari Imamura, Jemma Hudson, Michal Shimonovich, Graeme MacLennan, Luke Vale, Dawn Craig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 75% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 18 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,621,490
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#467
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,194
of 374,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#12
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.