You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justin Jagosh, Pierre Pluye, Ann C Macaulay, Jon Salsberg, Jim Henderson, Erin Sirett, Paula L Bush, Robbyn Seller, Geoff Wong, Trish Greenhalgh, Margaret Cargo, Carol P Herbert, Sarena D Seifer, Lawrence W Green |
| Abstract |
Participatory Research (PR) entails the co-governance of research by academic researchers and end-users. End-users are those who are affected by issues under study (e.g., community groups or populations affected by illness), or those positioned to act on the knowledge generated by research (e.g., clinicians, community leaders, health managers, patients, and policy makers). Systematic reviews assessing the generalizable benefits of PR must address: the diversity of research topics, methods, and intervention designs that involve a PR approach; varying degrees of end-user involvement in research co-governance, both within and between projects; and the complexity of outcomes arising from long-term partnerships. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 20% |
| Researcher | 58 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Librarian | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 24% |
| Unknown | 41 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 83 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 11% |
| Psychology | 14 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,618,415
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#740
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,081
of 108,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.